Triple

T19708477
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sir John Holt E473275 entity
Predicate notableCase P4 FINISHED
Object Keeble v Hickeringill NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Keeble v Hickeringill | Statement: [Sir John Holt, notableCase, Keeble v Hickeringill]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Keeble v Hickeringill
Context triple: [Sir John Holt, notableCase, Keeble v Hickeringill]
  • A. R v McIlkenny and others
    R v McIlkenny and others is the criminal case in which the men later known as the Birmingham Six were controversially convicted in 1975 for the Birmingham pub bombings, convictions that were ultimately quashed in 1991.
  • B. Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
    Thoburn v Sunderland City Council is a landmark 2002 English administrative law case in which the High Court articulated the concept of "constitutional statutes" within the UK legal system.
  • C. X v. Rex
    X v. Rex is a classic detective novel by Philip MacDonald featuring a tense murder investigation and intricate courtroom drama.
  • D. S.S. Wimbledon case
    The S.S. Wimbledon case was a landmark 1923 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that clarified the limits of state sovereignty under international treaty obligations, particularly regarding freedom of navigation through the Kiel Canal.
  • E. Hicklin v. Orbeck
    Hicklin v. Orbeck is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Alaska’s local-hire law for violating the Privileges and Immunities Clause by discriminating against nonresident workers.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Keeble v Hickeringill
Target entity description: Keeble v Hickeringill is an early 18th-century English common law case famous for establishing that malicious interference with another’s lawful use of their land, such as scaring away ducks from a decoy pond, can give rise to an action for damages.
  • A. R v McIlkenny and others
    R v McIlkenny and others is the criminal case in which the men later known as the Birmingham Six were controversially convicted in 1975 for the Birmingham pub bombings, convictions that were ultimately quashed in 1991.
  • B. Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
    Thoburn v Sunderland City Council is a landmark 2002 English administrative law case in which the High Court articulated the concept of "constitutional statutes" within the UK legal system.
  • C. X v. Rex
    X v. Rex is a classic detective novel by Philip MacDonald featuring a tense murder investigation and intricate courtroom drama.
  • D. S.S. Wimbledon case
    The S.S. Wimbledon case was a landmark 1923 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that clarified the limits of state sovereignty under international treaty obligations, particularly regarding freedom of navigation through the Kiel Canal.
  • E. Hicklin v. Orbeck
    Hicklin v. Orbeck is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Alaska’s local-hire law for violating the Privileges and Immunities Clause by discriminating against nonresident workers.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e516dd048190a0b6c93ea3e71f58 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e642bc754481908bdf5bfad069aec8 completed April 20, 2026, 3:14 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:46 p.m.