Triple
T19701132
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NPB regular season |
E473097
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesStandingsCriterion |
P56058
|
FINISHED |
| Object | win–loss record |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: win–loss record | Statement: [NPB regular season, usesStandingsCriterion, win–loss record]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesStandingsCriterion Context triple: [NPB regular season, usesStandingsCriterion, win–loss record]
-
A.
standingsCriteria
chosen
Indicates the rules or factors used to determine the relative ranking or position of entities in a standings or leaderboard.
-
B.
usesInStandingsTables
Indicates that something is employed or applied within standings tables, such as rankings or league tables, to represent or organize comparative positions.
-
C.
hasStandings
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a set of rankings, positions, or status levels within a competitive or comparative context.
-
D.
usesRegularSeasonStandingsFor
Indicates that one entity determines outcomes or decisions based on the regular season standings of another entity.
-
E.
hadStandingsPublishedIn
Indicates that the standings or rankings associated with an entity were published in a particular source, venue, or medium.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e515bef88190bc30781aea50537a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e642b667908190841bb5fb7bfdb3f7 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e530438c60819082364c7be3eef6f0 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:46 p.m.