Triple
T19699674
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sinai front |
E473055
|
entity |
| Predicate | strategicObjectiveOfEgypt |
P26556
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defend Sinai Peninsula |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defend Sinai Peninsula | Statement: [Sinai front, strategicObjectiveOfEgypt, defend Sinai Peninsula]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: strategicObjectiveOfEgypt Context triple: [Sinai front, strategicObjectiveOfEgypt, defend Sinai Peninsula]
-
A.
objectiveOfEgypt
chosen
Indicates that something is the goal, aim, or intended outcome pursued by Egypt.
-
B.
strategicRationaleForEgypt
Indicates that something serves as a strategic justification, motive, or reasoning specifically related to actions, policies, or decisions involving Egypt.
-
C.
conquestOfEgypt
Indicates the act or historical event of militarily subjugating and taking control of Egypt by another power.
-
D.
strategicObjectiveOttoman
Indicates that one entity serves as or relates to a strategic objective or goal specifically concerning the Ottoman Empire.
-
E.
EgyptRole
Indicates that an entity holds a specific role, function, or capacity in relation to Egypt.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e515bef88190bc30781aea50537a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e642b426608190a46abec3652a6ca0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e530438c60819082364c7be3eef6f0 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:46 p.m.