Triple
T19677440
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marion County government |
E472490
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOffice |
P1268
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Marion County Attorney |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Marion County Attorney | Statement: [Marion County government, hasOffice, Marion County Attorney]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Marion County Attorney Context triple: [Marion County government, hasOffice, Marion County Attorney]
-
A.
Knox County District Attorney General
The Knox County District Attorney General is the chief local prosecutor for Knox County, Tennessee, responsible for overseeing criminal prosecutions and representing the state in felony and misdemeanor cases within the county.
-
B.
Wayne County Prosecutor
The Wayne County Prosecutor is the chief legal officer responsible for prosecuting criminal cases and representing the public interest in Wayne County, Michigan.
-
C.
Hamilton County District Attorney General
The Hamilton County District Attorney General is the chief prosecutor responsible for representing the state in criminal cases and overseeing prosecutions within Hamilton County’s court system.
-
D.
Durham County Attorney
The Durham County Attorney is the chief legal advisor and representative for Durham County’s government, providing counsel on legal matters, drafting and reviewing legislation and contracts, and representing the county in civil proceedings.
-
E.
Kern County District Attorney
The Kern County District Attorney is the chief local prosecutor’s office for Kern County, California, responsible for investigating and prosecuting criminal cases on behalf of the public.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Marion County Attorney Target entity description: The Marion County Attorney is the chief legal officer responsible for providing legal counsel to the county government and representing it in civil and, in some jurisdictions, certain criminal matters.
-
A.
Knox County District Attorney General
The Knox County District Attorney General is the chief local prosecutor for Knox County, Tennessee, responsible for overseeing criminal prosecutions and representing the state in felony and misdemeanor cases within the county.
-
B.
Wayne County Prosecutor
The Wayne County Prosecutor is the chief legal officer responsible for prosecuting criminal cases and representing the public interest in Wayne County, Michigan.
-
C.
Hamilton County District Attorney General
The Hamilton County District Attorney General is the chief prosecutor responsible for representing the state in criminal cases and overseeing prosecutions within Hamilton County’s court system.
-
D.
Durham County Attorney
The Durham County Attorney is the chief legal advisor and representative for Durham County’s government, providing counsel on legal matters, drafting and reviewing legislation and contracts, and representing the county in civil proceedings.
-
E.
Kern County District Attorney
The Kern County District Attorney is the chief local prosecutor’s office for Kern County, California, responsible for investigating and prosecuting criminal cases on behalf of the public.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e514f2e08190ba70a4449519d218 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e641bceef881909c5b655af709c8c6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:45 p.m.