Triple

T19674069
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mesha E472407 entity
Predicate languageUsed P238 FINISHED
Object Moabite language NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Moabite language | Statement: [Mesha, languageUsed, Moabite language]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Moabite language
Context triple: [Mesha, languageUsed, Moabite language]
  • A. Moabite language chosen
    The Moabite language was an extinct Northwest Semitic language once spoken by the ancient Moabites in the region of modern-day Jordan, known primarily from a few inscriptions such as the Mesha Stele.
  • B. Giabal language
    The Giabal language is an extinct Australian Aboriginal language once spoken by the Giabal people of Queensland.
  • C. Abu Arapesh language
    The Abu Arapesh language is a Papuan language of the Arapesh people of Papua New Guinea, known for its complex noun classification and rich verbal morphology.
  • D. Edomite language
    The Edomite language was an extinct Northwest Semitic language once spoken by the ancient Edomites in the region south of the Kingdom of Judah.
  • E. Mojave language
    The Mojave language is a Native American Yuman language traditionally spoken by the Mojave people along the lower Colorado River in the southwestern United States.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e514f2e08190ba70a4449519d218 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6416e19d881909248c4f778f7147a completed April 20, 2026, 3:08 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:45 p.m.