Triple
T19648908
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Manitoba New Democratic Party |
E471754
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesPoliticalColour |
P7720
|
FINISHED |
| Object | orange |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: orange | Statement: [Manitoba New Democratic Party, usesPoliticalColour, orange]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesPoliticalColour Context triple: [Manitoba New Democratic Party, usesPoliticalColour, orange]
-
A.
hasPoliticalColorSymbolism
Indicates that something is associated with a particular political meaning or affiliation through its use of color.
-
B.
usesPoliticalLabel
Indicates that one entity applies or assigns a specific political label or classification to another entity.
-
C.
coalitionColor
Indicates the color associated with a particular coalition or alliance.
-
D.
partyColor
chosen
Indicates the political party affiliation or ideological group with which an entity is associated, typically represented by a specific color.
-
E.
countyColours
Indicates that a specific color or set of colors is associated with, represents, or is used to depict a particular county.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51395348190ac1416d46dfc6db0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:54 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e641278e9881909bdf8d440ef6eba4 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e514e941008190898d978d7bde91e4 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:44 p.m.