Triple
T19636258
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treaty 3 |
E471403
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInterpretationPrinciple |
P26605
|
FINISHED |
| Object | must be interpreted liberally in favour of Indigenous signatories |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: must be interpreted liberally in favour of Indigenous signatories | Statement: [Treaty 3, hasInterpretationPrinciple, must be interpreted liberally in favour of Indigenous signatories]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInterpretationPrinciple Context triple: [Treaty 3, hasInterpretationPrinciple, must be interpreted liberally in favour of Indigenous signatories]
-
A.
containsInterpretationOf
Indicates that one entity includes or embodies an interpretation or understanding of another entity.
-
B.
hasExplicitInterpretation
Indicates that something is associated with a clearly defined and unambiguous meaning or interpretation.
-
C.
recognizesPrinciple
chosen
Indicates that an entity acknowledges the validity, authority, or applicability of a particular principle.
-
D.
hasPrincipleDefinition
Indicates that something serves as the primary or authoritative definition of a given concept or term.
-
E.
areInterpretedInPracticeBy
Indicates that something (such as a rule, concept, or specification) is given concrete meaning or applied in real-world situations by a particular agent or group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e511f28481909f4bc3ea9191e54a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:54 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e641070528819085663c439f50148e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e514e5cb108190ae260e466c447314 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:44 p.m.