Triple
T19620917
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wall Drawing #260 |
E471003
|
entity |
| Predicate | authorshipConcept |
P102034
|
FINISHED |
| Object | distinction between idea and execution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: distinction between idea and execution | Statement: [Wall Drawing #260, authorshipConcept, distinction between idea and execution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authorshipConcept Context triple: [Wall Drawing #260, authorshipConcept, distinction between idea and execution]
-
A.
authorshipEvidence
Indicates evidence or justification supporting a claim that one entity is the author or creator of another.
-
B.
authorshipInitially
Indicates that an entity is the original or first author/creator of another entity before any subsequent authorship changes or contributions.
-
C.
authorshipStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of an entity’s role as an author in relation to a work (e.g., confirmed, disputed, anonymous, or pending).
-
D.
hasAuthorConcept
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a conceptual or abstract representation of its author, rather than a specific individual author instance.
-
E.
coAuthorAttributionTradition
Indicates that there is a recognized tradition or convention of attributing co-authorship between the related entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e510fa248190b7afb274a1d4cf73 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:54 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e640e668408190bc1e12a336b0687b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e514e5cb108190ae260e466c447314 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:43 p.m.