Triple
T19616480
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Horki District |
E470872
|
entity |
| Predicate | followsCountryLegalSystem |
P131132
|
FINISHED |
| Object | legal system of Belarus |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legal system of Belarus | Statement: [Horki District, followsCountryLegalSystem, legal system of Belarus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followsCountryLegalSystem Context triple: [Horki District, followsCountryLegalSystem, legal system of Belarus]
-
A.
countryOfLegalSystem
Indicates the relationship between a legal system and the country in which that legal system is officially established or applied.
-
B.
relatedLegalSystem
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
-
C.
usedLegalSystemOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity applied, followed, or operated under the legal system or body of laws belonging to another entity.
-
D.
separateLegalSystem
Indicates that one entity maintains its own distinct and independent legal system from another entity.
-
E.
legalSystemRegion
Indicates the geographic or jurisdictional region within which a particular legal system is applicable or in force.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e510fa248190b7afb274a1d4cf73 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:54 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e640e272808190800c5bccccd64753 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e514e5cb108190ae260e466c447314 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:43 p.m.