Triple
T1961563
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Father of the House of Commons |
E42597
|
entity |
| Predicate | holderMustBe |
P34434
|
FINISHED |
| Object | continuously serving MP |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: continuously serving MP | Statement: [Father of the House of Commons, holderMustBe, continuously serving MP]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holderMustBe Context triple: [Father of the House of Commons, holderMustBe, continuously serving MP]
-
A.
holdsFor
Indicates that a particular relationship or condition remains true over a specified interval or duration of time.
-
B.
holder
Indicates that one entity possesses, controls, or has custody of another entity, typically in a temporary or contextual sense.
-
C.
holdsUnder
Indicates that one entity maintains possession, control, or validity of another entity subject to certain conditions, constraints, or a specific context.
-
D.
heldAs
Indicates that one entity is kept, maintained, or regarded in a particular state, role, or condition by another entity.
-
E.
holdsIn
Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88711151c8190940b2572095059d7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb68a8e608190bc37a85913b3cd44 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abaff5dbd48190a9d36ca60de151db |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb6893eb881908923f0168374596a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:24 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.