Triple
T19588122
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Board on Professional Responsibility |
E470156
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | professional responsibility tribunal |
C28947
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: professional responsibility tribunal Context triple: [Board on Professional Responsibility, instanceOf, professional responsibility tribunal]
-
A.
judicial ethics committee
A judicial ethics committee is a body that reviews, advises on, and enforces standards of ethical conduct for judges to maintain integrity, impartiality, and public confidence in the judiciary.
-
B.
judicial discipline system
chosen
A judicial discipline system is a formal framework of rules, procedures, and oversight mechanisms designed to investigate, evaluate, and sanction misconduct or ethical violations by judges to maintain integrity and public confidence in the judiciary.
-
C.
professional conduct rules
Professional conduct rules are formal guidelines and standards that govern the ethical and responsible behavior of individuals within a specific profession.
-
D.
administrative tribunal
An administrative tribunal is a specialized quasi-judicial body that resolves disputes and makes determinations arising from the decisions or actions of government agencies under specific statutory frameworks.
-
E.
professional conduct code
A professional conduct code is a formal set of principles and rules that guide the ethical behavior, responsibilities, and standards of practice for members of a particular profession.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e510024481908415c0d616fa6186 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:54 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:43 p.m.