Triple

T19587222
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen E307116 entity
Predicate relatedToCase P3137 FINISHED
Object District of Columbia v. Heller — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: District of Columbia v. Heller | Statement: [New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, relatedToCase, District of Columbia v. Heller]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: District of Columbia v. Heller
Context triple: [New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, relatedToCase, District of Columbia v. Heller]
  • A. District of Columbia v. Heller chosen
    District of Columbia v. Heller is a landmark 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess firearms unconnected with service in a militia.
  • B. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen
    New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen is a 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down New York’s restrictive concealed-carry licensing regime and significantly expanded the scope of individual gun rights under the Second Amendment.
  • C. United States v. Lopez
    United States v. Lopez is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked the first time in decades the Court struck down a federal law for exceeding Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause, signaling a revival of limits on federal regulatory authority.
  • D. Washington v. Texas
    Washington v. Texas is a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held criminal defendants have a constitutional right to obtain testimony from favorable witnesses, incorporating the Compulsory Process Clause against the states.
  • E. United States v. Alvarez
    United States v. Alvarez is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the Stolen Valor Act’s criminalization of lying about receiving military honors as a violation of the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e510024481908415c0d616fa6186 completed April 10, 2026, 11:54 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e640523d10819091320a61456f6437 completed April 20, 2026, 3:03 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:43 p.m.