Triple

T19586811
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bitwarden E490125 entity
Predicate securityAudit P136365 FINISHED
Object third-party security assessments LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: third-party security assessments | Statement: [Bitwarden, securityAudit, third-party security assessments]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityAudit
Context triple: [Bitwarden, securityAudit, third-party security assessments]
  • A. securityAdvisory
    Indicates a relationship where an entity issues, references, or is associated with a warning or guidance about security vulnerabilities, risks, or protective measures.
  • B. securityOutcome
    Indicates the result or consequence of a security-related event, measure, or decision for the involved entities.
  • C. securityAspect
    Indicates a relationship where something pertains to, represents, or characterizes a particular aspect or dimension of security.
  • D. securityAttention
    Indicates that an entity is the focus of monitoring, concern, or scrutiny from a security perspective.
  • E. securityProgram
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, participates in, or is governed by a security program, such as a set of policies, controls, or initiatives related to safety or protection.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8dd9374819098e36349b3211663 completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e640523d10819091320a61456f6437 completed April 20, 2026, 3:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e514dbdb988190b55931a8138c73e7 completed April 19, 2026, 5:46 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5174b060c81908937ff9ff7fce611 completed April 19, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:42 p.m.