Triple
T19571481
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Latah County, Idaho |
E489726
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Viola, Idaho |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Viola, Idaho | Statement: [Latah County, Idaho, contains, Viola, Idaho]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Viola, Idaho Context triple: [Latah County, Idaho, contains, Viola, Idaho]
-
A.
Viola, Idaho
chosen
Viola, Idaho is a small unincorporated rural community in northern Idaho located near the Washington state border.
-
B.
Roberts, Idaho
Roberts, Idaho is a small rural city in eastern Idaho situated within Jefferson County, known for its agricultural surroundings and close-knit community.
-
C.
Johnson, Idaho
Johnson, Idaho is a small unincorporated community located in rural Latah County in the northern part of the state.
-
D.
Grant, Idaho
Grant, Idaho is a small unincorporated rural community located in Jefferson County in eastern Idaho.
-
E.
Hammett, Idaho
Hammett, Idaho is a small rural unincorporated community in southwestern Idaho known for its agricultural surroundings and proximity to the Snake River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8dd9374819098e36349b3211663 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6402103208190b80acdfa82b7a9c4 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:42 p.m.