Triple
T19571474
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Latah County, Idaho |
E489726
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Troy, Idaho |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Troy, Idaho | Statement: [Latah County, Idaho, contains, Troy, Idaho]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Troy, Idaho Context triple: [Latah County, Idaho, contains, Troy, Idaho]
-
A.
Troy, Idaho
chosen
Troy, Idaho is a small rural city in the Palouse region of northern Idaho known for its agricultural surroundings and close-knit community.
-
B.
Ketchum, Idaho
Ketchum, Idaho is a small resort city in central Idaho best known as the gateway to the Sun Valley ski area and for its outdoor recreation and arts scene.
-
C.
Buhl, Idaho
Buhl, Idaho is a small city in south-central Idaho known for its agricultural economy and proximity to the Snake River.
-
D.
Osgood, Idaho
Osgood, Idaho is a small unincorporated community in eastern Idaho located near the Snake River northwest of Idaho Falls.
-
E.
Johnson, Idaho
Johnson, Idaho is a small unincorporated community located in rural Latah County in the northern part of the state.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8dd9374819098e36349b3211663 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6402103208190b80acdfa82b7a9c4 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:42 p.m.