Triple
T19570365
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Afandale area |
E489692
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cimla ward |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cimla ward | Statement: [Afandale area, partOf, Cimla ward]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cimla ward Context triple: [Afandale area, partOf, Cimla ward]
-
A.
Cimla ward
chosen
Cimla ward is a local government electoral division in Neath Port Talbot, Wales, representing the community of Cimla on the Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council.
-
B.
Liss ward
Liss ward is a local electoral division in England that represents the village of Liss and its surrounding area on the relevant district or borough council.
-
C.
Battins ward
Battins ward is a local electoral division within the borough of Havant in Hampshire, England.
-
D.
Ladywood ward
Ladywood ward is an electoral district within the city of Birmingham, England, represented on the local council and encompassing part of the central urban area.
-
E.
Masson ward
Masson ward is an electoral division within the Derbyshire Dales area of Derbyshire, England, represented on the local district council.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8dd9374819098e36349b3211663 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6402043588190a99f5a55c5dcd8a6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:42 p.m.