Triple

T19570194
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mark of Cain E489687 entity
Predicate condemnedUse P136617 FINISHED
Object racial justification (by modern theologians) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: racial justification (by modern theologians) | Statement: [Mark of Cain, condemnedUse, racial justification (by modern theologians)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: condemnedUse
Context triple: [Mark of Cain, condemnedUse, racial justification (by modern theologians)]
  • A. condemnedAs
    Indicates that one entity formally or strongly denounces another entity by labeling it as wrong, guilty, or unacceptable.
  • B. condemnedIn
    Indicates that an entity was formally denounced, sentenced, or declared guilty within a particular place, context, or proceeding.
  • C. condemnedBy
    Indicates that an entity is judged, denounced, or declared wrong or unacceptable by another entity.
  • D. condemnedTo
    Indicates that one entity has been sentenced or assigned by another entity to undergo a specific punishment, usually involving severe or irreversible consequences.
  • E. condemnation
    Indicates that an entity expresses strong disapproval or denunciation of another entity, action, or situation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8dd9374819098e36349b3211663 completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6402043588190a99f5a55c5dcd8a6 completed April 20, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e514d4df3c8190b7e9b3b4fdf9452a completed April 19, 2026, 5:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e51796b4c48190b721114dde654bd7 completed April 19, 2026, 5:57 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:42 p.m.