Triple
T19568012
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Labour Party in the House of Lords |
E489633
|
entity |
| Predicate | isOppositionGroup |
P136610
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Labour Party in the House of Lords, isOppositionGroup, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isOppositionGroup Context triple: [Labour Party in the House of Lords, isOppositionGroup, true]
-
A.
isOppositionCounterpartOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the opposing or counterpart force, side, or position to another within a conflict, competition, or contrast.
-
B.
opposedByGroup
Indicates that an action, proposal, or entity is met with opposition or resistance from a particular group.
-
C.
hasOppositionCoalition
Indicates that a political entity faces an organized coalition of opposing parties or groups.
-
D.
oppositionAlliance
Indicates a relationship where entities form or belong to an alliance that is collectively opposed to another entity or group.
-
E.
opposesPartyType
Indicates that one party or entity is in opposition to, or acts against the interests or positions of, a particular type or category of party.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8dc5d8c8190a6d7bd8864f43ca0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e63f79adf08190b1c0b008f30b0acd |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e514d4df3c8190b7e9b3b4fdf9452a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e51796b4c48190b721114dde654bd7 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:42 p.m.