Triple

T19559130
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject John C. Reynolds E489395 entity
Predicate knownFor P22 FINISHED
Object Reynolds abstraction theorem NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Reynolds abstraction theorem | Statement: [John C. Reynolds, knownFor, Reynolds abstraction theorem]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Reynolds abstraction theorem
Context triple: [John C. Reynolds, knownFor, Reynolds abstraction theorem]
  • A. Blum axioms
    Blum axioms are a set of formal conditions introduced by Manuel Blum that rigorously define what constitutes a valid complexity measure in computational complexity theory.
  • B. Böhm–Jacopini theorem
    The Böhm–Jacopini theorem is a foundational result in computer science stating that any computer program can be written using only sequence, selection, and iteration constructs, without requiring goto statements.
  • C. Szekeres–Lindström theorem
    The Szekeres–Lindström theorem is a result in combinatorics that characterizes the maximum size of intersecting families of subsets, serving as a precursor to and special case of the Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem.
  • D. Łoś–Tarski preservation theorem
    The Łoś–Tarski preservation theorem is a fundamental result in model theory that characterizes when a first-order sentence is preserved under substructures in terms of its equivalence to a universal sentence.
  • E. Atkinson theorem
    Atkinson theorem is a fundamental result in functional analysis that characterizes Fredholm operators as precisely those bounded linear operators that are invertible modulo compact operators.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Reynolds abstraction theorem
Target entity description: The Reynolds abstraction theorem is a foundational result in type theory and programming language semantics that formally characterizes parametric polymorphism and explains why polymorphic functions behave uniformly across all their type instantiations.
  • A. Blum axioms
    Blum axioms are a set of formal conditions introduced by Manuel Blum that rigorously define what constitutes a valid complexity measure in computational complexity theory.
  • B. Böhm–Jacopini theorem
    The Böhm–Jacopini theorem is a foundational result in computer science stating that any computer program can be written using only sequence, selection, and iteration constructs, without requiring goto statements.
  • C. Szekeres–Lindström theorem
    The Szekeres–Lindström theorem is a result in combinatorics that characterizes the maximum size of intersecting families of subsets, serving as a precursor to and special case of the Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem.
  • D. Łoś–Tarski preservation theorem
    The Łoś–Tarski preservation theorem is a fundamental result in model theory that characterizes when a first-order sentence is preserved under substructures in terms of its equivalence to a universal sentence.
  • E. Atkinson theorem
    Atkinson theorem is a fundamental result in functional analysis that characterizes Fredholm operators as precisely those bounded linear operators that are invertible modulo compact operators.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8dc5d8c8190a6d7bd8864f43ca0 completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e63f723d5081909553a4363b579a6b completed April 20, 2026, 3 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:42 p.m.