Triple
T19538937
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carmel, Indiana |
E488842
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSisterCity |
P919
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Xiangyang, China |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Xiangyang, China | Statement: [Carmel, Indiana, hasSisterCity, Xiangyang, China]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Xiangyang, China Context triple: [Carmel, Indiana, hasSisterCity, Xiangyang, China]
-
A.
Zhongxiang, Hubei
Zhongxiang, Hubei is a county-level city in central China known for its historical sites, including the Ming-era Xianling Mausoleum complex.
-
B.
Xiangyang
chosen
Xiangyang is a historic prefecture-level city in northern Hubei Province, China, known for its strategic location on the Han River and well-preserved ancient city walls.
-
C.
Xingxian, Hubei
Xingxian, Hubei is a locality in China historically notable as the birthplace of the Ming dynasty Jiajing Emperor.
-
D.
Ziyang
Ziyang is the art name (courtesy name) of Zhu Xi, the influential Neo-Confucian philosopher of the Southern Song dynasty.
-
E.
Ziyang
Ziyang is a city in Sichuan Province, China, located within the fertile and densely populated Chengdu Plain region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8db5b6c8190984b61f91981f575 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e638710b8c81908335535869fc9130 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:41 p.m.