Triple
T19535578
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Regional at Best |
E488758
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Holding on to You |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Holding on to You | Statement: [Regional at Best, hasPart, Holding on to You]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Holding on to You Context triple: [Regional at Best, hasPart, Holding on to You]
-
A.
Holding on to You
chosen
"Holding on to You" is a popular song by the American musical duo Twenty One Pilots, known for its blend of alternative hip hop, indie pop, and introspective lyrics.
-
B.
Holding On for You
"Holding On for You" is a pop ballad by British-Irish group Liberty X, released in 2002 and known for its soulful vocals and emotional lyrics.
-
C.
Holding On
"Holding On" is a song featured on Jay Sean's debut studio album "Me Against Myself."
-
D.
Holding On
"Holding On" is a song by the British electronic music duo Disclosure, known for its soulful vocals and house-influenced production.
-
E.
Holding On
"Holding On" is a soulful jazz and R&B song by Gregory Porter, known for its rich vocals and emotive, socially conscious lyrics.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8db5b6c8190984b61f91981f575 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6386ddc208190962195b8aa568bed |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:41 p.m.