Triple

T1953100
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Court of Appeal of England and Wales E42202 entity
Predicate decisionsForm P2165 FINISHED
Object binding precedent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: binding precedent | Statement: [Court of Appeal of England and Wales, decisionsForm, binding precedent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: decisionsForm
Context triple: [Court of Appeal of England and Wales, decisionsForm, binding precedent]
  • A. decisionsAre
    Indicates that certain choices, judgments, or resolutions possess a specified quality, status, or classification.
  • B. decides
    Indicates that an entity makes a choice or determination between options, often resolving uncertainty or selecting a course of action.
  • C. decisionType chosen
    Indicates the specific category or nature of a decision associated with an entity or event.
  • D. decidesOn
    Indicates that an agent makes a choice or determination regarding a particular option, issue, or course of action.
  • E. decisionBody
    Indicates that one entity serves as the authoritative body or group responsible for making a particular decision regarding another entity or matter.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8870eea088190a38781990812a9bc completed March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb3501d108190bc5cb23f53db4411 completed March 7, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abaff3eda88190b643994cb4dfb8df completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.