Triple

T19525930
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Batu Lintang camp E488517 entity
Predicate hasTypeOfDetainee P50528 FINISHED
Object civilian internees LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: civilian internees | Statement: [Batu Lintang camp, hasTypeOfDetainee, civilian internees]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfDetainee
Context triple: [Batu Lintang camp, hasTypeOfDetainee, civilian internees]
  • A. detentionType chosen
    Indicates the specific category or form of detention applied to an entity within a custodial or restrictive context.
  • B. detaineeStatus
    Indicates the current legal or custodial condition of a person being detained, such as whether they are in custody, released, or under a specific detention regime.
  • C. detainedBy
    Indicates that an entity is being held in custody or confinement by another entity, typically an authority or controlling party.
  • D. detainedFor
    Indicates that one entity is being held in custody or confinement because of, or as a consequence of, another entity (such as a reason, charge, or event).
  • E. detainsUnder
    Indicates that one entity holds another in custody or confinement under a specific legal authority, provision, or condition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8da8bec819081f400199491ccc3 completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6363aeb8c8190be2bdd73e421af96 completed April 20, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e514c9c00481909b76bda67957e58b completed April 19, 2026, 5:45 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:41 p.m.