Triple
T195142
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | MLS Cup 2005 |
E3802
|
entity |
| Predicate | loserScore |
P7493
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 0 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 0 | Statement: [MLS Cup 2005, loserScore, 0]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: loserScore Context triple: [MLS Cup 2005, loserScore, 0]
-
A.
finalScore
Indicates the resulting or overall score achieved after all contributing actions, events, or evaluations are completed.
-
B.
lostPowerIn
Indicates that an entity has experienced a loss of electrical or functional power while in or at a specified location or context.
-
C.
lostTo
Indicates that one entity was defeated by another in a competition, conflict, or comparison.
-
D.
defeatedCandidate
Indicates that one candidate has won an election or contest against another candidate, causing the other to lose.
-
E.
lostPowerAgainIn
Indicates that an entity has experienced a repeated loss of power in a specified location or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2548debd48190ae3a06d6e65b53c6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:35 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25969425081908e178db8ba4631c2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25677da14819094cd02868fd30c83 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a258b30f6c8190be2181f30c40e04d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:41 a.m.