Triple

T19512059
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dunántúl E488179 entity
Predicate containsCity P294 FINISHED
Object Zalaegerszeg NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zalaegerszeg | Statement: [Dunántúl, containsCity, Zalaegerszeg]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Zalaegerszeg
Context triple: [Dunántúl, containsCity, Zalaegerszeg]
  • A. Zalaegerszeg chosen
    Zalaegerszeg is a city in western Hungary that serves as the administrative center of Zala County and a regional economic and cultural hub.
  • B. Budakeszi
    Budakeszi is a small town in Hungary, located just west of Budapest and known for its surrounding forests and natural recreational areas.
  • C. Dunakeszi
    Dunakeszi is a town in Hungary located just north of Budapest, known as a rapidly growing suburban and commuter settlement along the Danube in Pest County.
  • D. Kaposvár
    Kaposvár is a city in southwestern Hungary that serves as the administrative and cultural center of Somogy County.
  • E. Szeged
    Szeged is a prominent city in southern Hungary known for its university, paprika production, and distinctive Art Nouveau architecture.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8da8bec819081f400199491ccc3 completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6359908fc8190bd05f26d4271d268 completed April 20, 2026, 2:18 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:40 p.m.