Triple
T19506426
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | German administrative court system |
E488032
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAppealInstance |
P46916
|
FINISHED |
| Object | higher administrative courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: higher administrative courts | Statement: [German administrative court system, hasAppealInstance, higher administrative courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAppealInstance Context triple: [German administrative court system, hasAppealInstance, higher administrative courts]
-
A.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
B.
hasEnduringAppeal
Indicates that something continues to attract interest, admiration, or enjoyment over a long period of time.
-
C.
handlesAppealsIn
Indicates that an entity is responsible for processing or adjudicating appeals within a specified jurisdiction, domain, or context.
-
D.
canBeAppealedTo
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
-
E.
appellateInstance
chosen
Indicates that one legal proceeding or court serves as the appellate (reviewing) instance for another lower-level decision or case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d9d1c88190b01cd78b8be49384 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e63511fc688190bd1474406060fa1b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4fd7bd25881908caa04eaef1f6718 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:40 p.m.