Triple

T19497830
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Texas Rangers–New York Yankees rivalry E487818 entity
Predicate fanBaseContrast P136140 FINISHED
Object large-market vs growing-market dynamic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: large-market vs growing-market dynamic | Statement: [Texas Rangers–New York Yankees rivalry, fanBaseContrast, large-market vs growing-market dynamic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fanBaseContrast
Context triple: [Texas Rangers–New York Yankees rivalry, fanBaseContrast, large-market vs growing-market dynamic]
  • A. fanBaseInteraction
    Indicates interactions or engagements occurring between a fan base and the subject, such as communication, feedback, or participatory activities.
  • B. fanBaseSize
    Indicates the size or magnitude of the group of fans or supporters associated with an entity.
  • C. fanBase
    Indicates that one entity is the group of admirers or supporters devoted to another entity.
  • D. fanBaseScope
    Indicates the extent or range of people who are considered fans or followers of an entity.
  • E. fanBaseOverlap
    Indicates that two entities share a significant portion of their fans or audience in common.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d9d1c88190b01cd78b8be49384 completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e634924e24819085cd61ba33c84570 completed April 20, 2026, 2:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4fd7bd25881908caa04eaef1f6718 completed April 19, 2026, 4:06 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5004d3a708190a1c13c8f644f3926 completed April 19, 2026, 4:18 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:40 p.m.