Triple
T19494676
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Punchscan |
E487738
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | end-to-end auditable voting system |
C16851
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: end-to-end auditable voting system Context triple: [Punchscan, instanceOf, end-to-end auditable voting system]
-
A.
end-to-end auditable voting scheme
chosen
An end-to-end auditable voting scheme is a voting system that allows each voter and independent observers to verify, from ballot casting through tallying, that all recorded votes are correctly included in the final result without revealing how any individual voted.
-
B.
cryptographic voting system
A cryptographic voting system is a secure, privacy-preserving election mechanism that uses cryptographic protocols to ensure ballot secrecy, voter authentication, integrity of tallies, and verifiable results without revealing individual votes.
-
C.
election technology
Election technology encompasses the digital and mechanical systems, tools, and processes used to support, conduct, secure, and verify elections, including voter registration, ballot casting, counting, and result reporting.
-
D.
peer-to-peer electronic cash system
A peer-to-peer electronic cash system is a decentralized digital payment network that allows users to send value directly to one another over the internet without relying on trusted intermediaries like banks or payment processors.
-
E.
fault-tolerant consensus protocol
A fault-tolerant consensus protocol is a distributed algorithm that enables a group of nodes to reliably agree on a shared state or value even when some nodes fail or behave maliciously.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d9d1c88190b01cd78b8be49384 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:40 p.m.