Triple

T19494226
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nigel d’Aubigny E487727 entity
Predicate usedMarriageFor P136124 FINISHED
Object consolidation of baronial power LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consolidation of baronial power | Statement: [Nigel d’Aubigny, usedMarriageFor, consolidation of baronial power]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedMarriageFor
Context triple: [Nigel d’Aubigny, usedMarriageFor, consolidation of baronial power]
  • A. usedDuringMarriageTo
    Indicates that something (such as a name, asset, or status) was in use by or applicable to a person or entity specifically during the period of their marriage.
  • B. usedBeforeMarriageAs
    Indicates that one entity was used by or associated with another entity prior to that entity’s marriage.
  • C. hasMarriage
    Indicates a marital relationship exists between the two entities, specifying that they are or were legally married to each other.
  • D. marriageContext
    Indicates the situational or cultural circumstances under which a marriage occurs or exists, such as legal, social, or religious conditions surrounding the marital relationship.
  • E. marriedBefore
    Indicates that one entity entered into a marriage at an earlier time than the other entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d9d1c88190b01cd78b8be49384 completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6349002788190afe7831d008d440f completed April 20, 2026, 2:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4fd7883308190b73912a71a35a835 completed April 19, 2026, 4:06 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5004d3a708190a1c13c8f644f3926 completed April 19, 2026, 4:18 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:40 p.m.