Triple
T19493279
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dame Commander of the Royal Victorian Order |
E487705
|
entity |
| Predicate | bestowedPersonally |
P60596
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Dame Commander of the Royal Victorian Order, bestowedPersonally, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bestowedPersonally Context triple: [Dame Commander of the Royal Victorian Order, bestowedPersonally, true]
-
A.
personalGiftOf
Indicates that one entity has personally given another entity a gift, emphasizing a direct, individual act of gifting between them.
-
B.
blessedBy
Indicates that one entity has conferred a blessing, favor, or sacred endorsement upon another entity.
-
C.
isPersonalGiftOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a gift personally given by another entity, typically reflecting a direct, individual act of giving.
-
D.
giftedBy
Indicates that one entity has given or presented another entity as a gift to a recipient.
-
E.
bequeathed
Indicates that one entity has left or given property, rights, or assets to another entity through a will or testament.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d9d1c88190b01cd78b8be49384 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6348f4d708190a6e612863fee4b97 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4fd7883308190b73912a71a35a835 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:39 p.m.