Triple
T19489338
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kutno County |
E487604
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRuralGmina |
P46876
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Łanięta |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Łanięta | Statement: [Kutno County, hasRuralGmina, Gmina Łanięta]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Łanięta Context triple: [Kutno County, hasRuralGmina, Gmina Łanięta]
-
A.
Gmina Łanięta
chosen
Gmina Łanięta is a rural administrative district in central Poland, situated within the Łódź Voivodeship.
-
B.
Gmina Łęczna
Gmina Łęczna is an administrative district (gmina) in eastern Poland that encompasses the town of Łęczna and surrounding rural areas within Lublin Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Wilczęta
Gmina Wilczęta is a rural administrative district in northern Poland, known for its small villages and forested landscapes within the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Wiśniowa
Gmina Wiśniowa is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gmina Łącko
Gmina Łącko is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, known for its picturesque mountainous landscapes and traditional highland culture.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d924388190b847cb15bb3d0aff |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6348ad4088190b530f47efca90165 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:39 p.m.