Triple
T19489312
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kutno County |
E487604
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Bedlno |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Bedlno | Statement: [Kutno County, contains, Gmina Bedlno]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Bedlno Context triple: [Kutno County, contains, Gmina Bedlno]
-
A.
Gmina Bedlno
chosen
Gmina Bedlno is a rural administrative district (gmina) in central Poland, located in the Łódź Voivodeship and known for its agricultural character and small villages.
-
B.
Gmina Bielawy
Gmina Bielawy is a rural administrative district in central Poland, known for encompassing several villages and agricultural areas.
-
C.
Gmina Gnojno
Gmina Gnojno is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, located within the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Jedwabno
Gmina Jedwabno is a rural administrative district in northern Poland, known for its forests, lakes, and small villages in the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gmina Biecz
Gmina Biecz is an urban-rural administrative district in southern Poland centered on the historic town of Biecz in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d924388190b847cb15bb3d0aff |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6348ad4088190b530f47efca90165 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:39 p.m.