Triple

T19482396
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Introduction to Cultural Anthropology E487421 entity
Predicate coversTheory P136097 FINISHED
Object functionalism LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: functionalism | Statement: [Introduction to Cultural Anthropology, coversTheory, functionalism]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coversTheory
Context triple: [Introduction to Cultural Anthropology, coversTheory, functionalism]
  • A. presentsTheory
    Indicates that one entity formally puts forward or explains a theory to another entity or audience.
  • B. viewOnTheories
    Indicates a relationship where an entity holds or expresses a particular perspective, stance, or opinion regarding one or more theories.
  • C. hasTheory
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is characterized by a particular theory.
  • D. governingTheory
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary theoretical framework or principle that explains, constrains, or directs the behavior, interpretation, or operation of another entity.
  • E. followsTheoryOf
    Indicates that one entity adheres to, is based on, or is guided by the theoretical framework or principles established by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d924388190b847cb15bb3d0aff completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6343ab16481909b508ba0a08ea191 completed April 20, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4fd7883308190b73912a71a35a835 completed April 19, 2026, 4:06 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5004d3a708190a1c13c8f644f3926 completed April 19, 2026, 4:18 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:39 p.m.