Triple
T19479629
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Åsnes municipality |
E487344
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasParish |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Åsnes parish |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Åsnes parish | Statement: [Åsnes municipality, hasParish, Åsnes parish]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Åsnes parish Context triple: [Åsnes municipality, hasParish, Åsnes parish]
-
A.
Åsnes parish
chosen
Åsnes parish is a Church of Norway parish serving the local community in Åsnes municipality in Innlandet county, Norway.
-
B.
Åsnes municipality
Åsnes municipality is a rural municipality in Innlandet county, Norway, known for its forests, agriculture, and location in the traditional district of Solør.
-
C.
Sandnes parish
Sandnes parish is a local Church of Norway parish serving the community within the municipality of Bygland in Agder county, Norway.
-
D.
Kongsberg parish
Kongsberg parish is a Church of Norway parish centered in the town of Kongsberg, known for its historic mining heritage and prominent Kongsberg Church.
-
E.
Sogndal parish
Sogndal parish is a Church of Norway parish serving the local community in and around the village of Sogndal in Vestland county.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d924388190b847cb15bb3d0aff |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6343882a88190b3cfa65e6cac80d3 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:39 p.m.