Triple

T19475927
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Japanese occupation of Attu E487245 entity
Predicate recaptureForceCommander P136067 FINISHED
Object Albert E. Brown NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Albert E. Brown | Statement: [Japanese occupation of Attu, recaptureForceCommander, Albert E. Brown]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recaptureForceCommander
Context triple: [Japanese occupation of Attu, recaptureForceCommander, Albert E. Brown]
  • A. capturedCommander
    Indicates that one party has taken a military commander from another party into custody or control.
  • B. escortCommander
    Indicates that one entity serves as the commanding officer responsible for leading or overseeing an escort force or mission involving another entity.
  • C. capturedForce
    Indicates that one entity has taken control of another entity or group through force, restraint, or coercive action.
  • D. wasRecapturedBy
    Indicates that an entity which had previously escaped or been released was caught again by another entity.
  • E. fireshipForceCommander
    Indicates that an entity serves as the commanding officer responsible for directing and overseeing fireship operations.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d924388190b847cb15bb3d0aff completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e633f1f8688190a2df574a9e0a194d completed April 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4fd7883308190b73912a71a35a835 completed April 19, 2026, 4:06 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5004d3a708190a1c13c8f644f3926 completed April 19, 2026, 4:18 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:39 p.m.