Triple
T194687
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bill Belichick |
E3792
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableStrategy |
P22
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defensive game planning |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defensive game planning | Statement: [Bill Belichick, notableStrategy, defensive game planning]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableStrategy Context triple: [Bill Belichick, notableStrategy, defensive game planning]
-
A.
notableStandard
Indicates that one entity is a widely recognized or influential standard that the other entity is associated with or exemplifies.
-
B.
notableRule
Indicates that a rule or regulation is particularly significant, prominent, or noteworthy within a given context.
-
C.
notableFor
chosen
Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
-
D.
notableSingle
Indicates that the subject is particularly recognized or distinguished for one specific, individual instance (such as a single work, event, or achievement).
-
E.
notableHolder
Indicates that a person or entity is a distinguished or prominent holder of a particular position, title, or role.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2548debd48190ae3a06d6e65b53c6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:35 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25969425081908e178db8ba4631c2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a256769ad8819083c1d83082c0215e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:41 a.m.