Triple
T19467866
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kanabhuk |
E487045
|
entity |
| Predicate | epistemologyFocus |
P80926
|
FINISHED |
| Object | perception and inference |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: perception and inference | Statement: [Kanabhuk, epistemologyFocus, perception and inference]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: epistemologyFocus Context triple: [Kanabhuk, epistemologyFocus, perception and inference]
-
A.
epistemologicalFocus
chosen
Indicates that something is primarily concerned with questions about knowledge, its nature, sources, justification, or limits.
-
B.
typeOfEpistemology
Indicates that one epistemological position, theory, or approach is classified as a specific kind or category within the broader domain of epistemology.
-
C.
philosophyScope
Indicates the conceptual domain or range of topics, questions, or issues that a particular philosophical view, theory, or inquiry is concerned with.
-
D.
epistemicPriority
Indicates that one piece of information, belief, or source is treated as more authoritative or reliable than another in determining what is accepted as true.
-
E.
philosophicalMethod
Indicates the method, approach, or technique used in conducting philosophical inquiry or reasoning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d86d608190bd199a98d0297f27 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e633e2aee081908330a5665fa60482 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4fd7499a4819082bec0be8afba35c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:39 p.m.