Triple

T1946264
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lezginka (Azerbaijani variant) E42060 entity
Predicate hasCostumeElement P28106 FINISHED
Object traditional Caucasian-style outfits LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditional Caucasian-style outfits | Statement: [Lezginka (Azerbaijani variant), hasCostumeElement, traditional Caucasian-style outfits]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCostumeElement
Context triple: [Lezginka (Azerbaijani variant), hasCostumeElement, traditional Caucasian-style outfits]
  • A. costumeElement chosen
    Indicates that one item functions as a component or part of another item's costume.
  • B. haveDistinctCostume
    Indicates that the entities each possess a costume that is different from the others’ costumes.
  • C. usesElement
    Indicates that one entity makes use of, incorporates, or depends on a specified element in its structure, function, or behavior.
  • D. hasCosmetics
    Indicates that one entity possesses, uses, or is associated with cosmetic products or beauty-related items in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. isCostumed
    Indicates that an entity is wearing or otherwise adorned with a costume.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8870e08fc8190a319cbf2600db15f completed March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb32ebae881908f7541301f0198ae completed March 7, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abaff25a588190bb4cbc8df9fc6d64 completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.