Triple
T19447084
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Barbara Goldsmith |
E486506
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Johnson v. Johnson |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Johnson v. Johnson | Statement: [Barbara Goldsmith, notableWork, Johnson v. Johnson]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Johnson v. Johnson Context triple: [Barbara Goldsmith, notableWork, Johnson v. Johnson]
-
A.
Miller v. Johnson
Miller v. Johnson is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the doctrine on racial gerrymandering and the Equal Protection Clause in legislative redistricting.
-
B.
Gittes vs. Gittes
Gittes vs. Gittes was a proposed but never produced third film intended to continue the Chinatown neo-noir saga centered on private investigator J.J. Gittes.
-
C.
Raymond v. Raymond
Raymond v. Raymond is a 2010 R&B studio album by American singer Usher that explores themes of love, heartbreak, and personal transformation.
-
D.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
E.
Edwards v. Balisok
Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Johnson v. Johnson Target entity description: Johnson v. Johnson is a nonfiction book by Barbara Goldsmith that chronicles the scandalous divorce and inheritance battle within the wealthy Johnson & Johnson family.
-
A.
Miller v. Johnson
Miller v. Johnson is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the doctrine on racial gerrymandering and the Equal Protection Clause in legislative redistricting.
-
B.
Gittes vs. Gittes
Gittes vs. Gittes was a proposed but never produced third film intended to continue the Chinatown neo-noir saga centered on private investigator J.J. Gittes.
-
C.
Raymond v. Raymond
Raymond v. Raymond is a 2010 R&B studio album by American singer Usher that explores themes of love, heartbreak, and personal transformation.
-
D.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
E.
Edwards v. Balisok
Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d7ad488190a3373045029b0f3b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6338b25d88190bc137a411576c73f |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:38 p.m.