Triple

T19447084
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Barbara Goldsmith E486506 entity
Predicate notableWork P4 FINISHED
Object Johnson v. Johnson NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Johnson v. Johnson | Statement: [Barbara Goldsmith, notableWork, Johnson v. Johnson]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Johnson v. Johnson
Context triple: [Barbara Goldsmith, notableWork, Johnson v. Johnson]
  • A. Miller v. Johnson
    Miller v. Johnson is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the doctrine on racial gerrymandering and the Equal Protection Clause in legislative redistricting.
  • B. Gittes vs. Gittes
    Gittes vs. Gittes was a proposed but never produced third film intended to continue the Chinatown neo-noir saga centered on private investigator J.J. Gittes.
  • C. Raymond v. Raymond
    Raymond v. Raymond is a 2010 R&B studio album by American singer Usher that explores themes of love, heartbreak, and personal transformation.
  • D. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • E. Edwards v. Balisok
    Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Johnson v. Johnson
Target entity description: Johnson v. Johnson is a nonfiction book by Barbara Goldsmith that chronicles the scandalous divorce and inheritance battle within the wealthy Johnson & Johnson family.
  • A. Miller v. Johnson
    Miller v. Johnson is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the doctrine on racial gerrymandering and the Equal Protection Clause in legislative redistricting.
  • B. Gittes vs. Gittes
    Gittes vs. Gittes was a proposed but never produced third film intended to continue the Chinatown neo-noir saga centered on private investigator J.J. Gittes.
  • C. Raymond v. Raymond
    Raymond v. Raymond is a 2010 R&B studio album by American singer Usher that explores themes of love, heartbreak, and personal transformation.
  • D. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • E. Edwards v. Balisok
    Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d7ad488190a3373045029b0f3b completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6338b25d88190bc137a411576c73f completed April 20, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:38 p.m.