Triple
T19442790
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Western Federation of Miners |
E486391
|
entity |
| Predicate | notable event |
P259
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial | Statement: [Western Federation of Miners, notable event, Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial Context triple: [Western Federation of Miners, notable event, Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial]
-
A.
Homma trial
The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
-
B.
Durousseau v. United States
Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
-
C.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
D.
Adair v. United States
Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
-
E.
Pohl Case
The Pohl Case was one of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials in which Oswald Pohl and other SS officials were prosecuted for their roles in administering Nazi concentration camps and exploiting forced labor.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial Target entity description: The Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial was a highly publicized early 20th-century U.S. court case in which leaders of the Western Federation of Miners were controversially prosecuted for the assassination of former Idaho Governor Frank Steunenberg, becoming a landmark episode in American labor and legal history.
-
A.
Homma trial
The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
-
B.
Durousseau v. United States
Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
-
C.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
D.
Adair v. United States
Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
-
E.
Pohl Case
The Pohl Case was one of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials in which Oswald Pohl and other SS officials were prosecuted for their roles in administering Nazi concentration camps and exploiting forced labor.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d7ad488190a3373045029b0f3b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e63386c520819092bea5d7f259a226 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:38 p.m.