Triple

T19442790
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Western Federation of Miners E486391 entity
Predicate notable event P259 FINISHED
Object Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial | Statement: [Western Federation of Miners, notable event, Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial
Context triple: [Western Federation of Miners, notable event, Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial]
  • A. Homma trial
    The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
  • B. Durousseau v. United States
    Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
  • C. Yates v. United States
    Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
  • D. Adair v. United States
    Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
  • E. Pohl Case
    The Pohl Case was one of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials in which Oswald Pohl and other SS officials were prosecuted for their roles in administering Nazi concentration camps and exploiting forced labor.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial
Target entity description: The Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial was a highly publicized early 20th-century U.S. court case in which leaders of the Western Federation of Miners were controversially prosecuted for the assassination of former Idaho Governor Frank Steunenberg, becoming a landmark episode in American labor and legal history.
  • A. Homma trial
    The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
  • B. Durousseau v. United States
    Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
  • C. Yates v. United States
    Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
  • D. Adair v. United States
    Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
  • E. Pohl Case
    The Pohl Case was one of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials in which Oswald Pohl and other SS officials were prosecuted for their roles in administering Nazi concentration camps and exploiting forced labor.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d7ad488190a3373045029b0f3b completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e63386c520819092bea5d7f259a226 completed April 20, 2026, 2:09 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:38 p.m.