Triple
T19429629
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Towa language |
E486074
|
entity |
| Predicate | isRelatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tiwa languages |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tiwa languages | Statement: [Towa language, isRelatedTo, Tiwa languages]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tiwa languages Context triple: [Towa language, isRelatedTo, Tiwa languages]
-
A.
Tiwa languages
chosen
The Tiwa languages are a group of closely related Tanoan languages spoken by Tiwa Pueblo peoples in parts of New Mexico and Texas.
-
B.
Tiwa language
Tiwa language is a Tibeto-Burman language spoken by the Tiwa (Lalung) people of northeastern India, primarily in Assam and Meghalaya.
-
C.
Wati languages
Wati languages are a subgroup of Australian Aboriginal Pama–Nyungan languages spoken traditionally across parts of central and western Australia.
-
D.
Tebu languages
The Tebu languages are a group of closely related Saharan languages spoken primarily by the Tebu people across parts of Chad, Niger, and Libya.
-
E.
Tagbanwa languages
Tagbanwa languages are a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken by the Tagbanwa people of Palawan in the Philippines, known for their association with one of the country’s indigenous scripts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d688f881909c85104a62e09d8a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6321b78d08190b86cef7c60cbb61c |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:37 p.m.