Triple

T19426389
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Symphony No. 2 in E minor, Op. 27 E485989 entity
Predicate usesMotivicTechnique P84026 FINISHED
Object cyclical thematic recall LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cyclical thematic recall | Statement: [Symphony No. 2 in E minor, Op. 27, usesMotivicTechnique, cyclical thematic recall]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesMotivicTechnique
Context triple: [Symphony No. 2 in E minor, Op. 27, usesMotivicTechnique, cyclical thematic recall]
  • A. usesMotifsFrom
    Indicates that one entity incorporates or draws upon recurring themes, patterns, or elements that originate from another entity.
  • B. usesCantusFirmus
    Indicates that one musical element is based on or incorporates a pre-existing cantus firmus melody as its structural foundation.
  • C. hasMotivicFunction
    Indicates that one musical element serves a specific thematic or structural role in relation to a larger motive or passage.
  • D. melodicPattern chosen
    Indicates a recurring sequence of musical tones or intervals that forms a recognizable melodic structure within a piece.
  • E. hasMelodicHook
    Indicates that a musical piece contains a distinctive, memorable melodic phrase designed to catch the listener’s attention.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d688f881909c85104a62e09d8a completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e63219f27481909fe686209defc971 completed April 20, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4fd6e806081909053f325ba01ab6b completed April 19, 2026, 4:06 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:37 p.m.