Triple

T19403563
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject M-i-k-e H-u-n-t E485389 entity
Predicate appropriateness P97883 FINISHED
Object not suitable for formal contexts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not suitable for formal contexts | Statement: [M-i-k-e H-u-n-t, appropriateness, not suitable for formal contexts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appropriateness
Context triple: [M-i-k-e H-u-n-t, appropriateness, not suitable for formal contexts]
  • A. lessSuitableFor
    Indicates that one entity is comparatively less appropriate, effective, or fitting than another for a given purpose, context, or condition.
  • B. allows
    Indicates that one entity grants permission, capability, or opportunity for another entity to perform an action or be in a certain state.
  • C. decorum chosen
    Indicates adherence to socially accepted standards of proper, polite, or appropriate behavior in a given context.
  • D. suit
    Indicates that one entity is appropriate, fitting, or satisfactory for another entity or a particular purpose or situation.
  • E. aspect
    Indicates a specific temporal phase or manner in which an action, event, or state unfolds or is viewed (e.g., ongoing, completed, habitual).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d5162481909db12435d9535c1a completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6257937d081909dbc5804d2505938 completed April 20, 2026, 1:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4fd68b1f881908d273de1fee81a75 completed April 19, 2026, 4:06 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:36 p.m.