Triple

T19399267
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Wood-Pile E485272 entity
Predicate authorStyleFeature P27486 FINISHED
Object colloquial diction LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: colloquial diction | Statement: [The Wood-Pile, authorStyleFeature, colloquial diction]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authorStyleFeature
Context triple: [The Wood-Pile, authorStyleFeature, colloquial diction]
  • A. authorStyle chosen
    Indicates the stylistic characteristics or manner of expression associated with a particular author in their works.
  • B. stylingFeature
    Indicates a visual or design-related characteristic applied to an entity, such as formatting, layout, or aesthetic treatment.
  • C. authorOfStyle
    Indicates that an entity is the creator or originator of a particular style, method, or artistic approach.
  • D. characterStyle
    Indicates how a character is visually or typographically presented, such as its font, weight, size, or decorative attributes.
  • E. notableStyleFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses a distinctive stylistic characteristic or design element that is especially noteworthy or defining.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d5162481909db12435d9535c1a completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e62575d78881909c2cfee799859261 completed April 20, 2026, 1:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4fd602f008190aa9bc76ae17e4ce1 completed April 19, 2026, 4:05 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:36 p.m.