Triple
T19397229
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bonner County |
E485222
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Boundary County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Boundary County | Statement: [Bonner County, borders, Boundary County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Boundary County Context triple: [Bonner County, borders, Boundary County]
-
A.
Boundary County
chosen
Boundary County is a rural county in the far northern tip of Idaho, known for its forests, mountains, and location along the Canadian border.
-
B.
Fillmore County
Fillmore County is a rural county in southeastern Minnesota known for its rolling farmland, small towns, and karst landscapes with caves and sinkholes.
-
C.
Valley County
Valley County is a mountainous county in central Idaho known for its extensive forests, outdoor recreation, and inclusion of large portions of Boise National Forest.
-
D.
Urana County
Urana County is a cadastral division in New South Wales, Australia, used for land administration and property title purposes.
-
E.
Forest County
Forest County is a sparsely populated, heavily forested rural county in northwestern Pennsylvania known for its extensive public lands and outdoor recreation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d5162481909db12435d9535c1a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e62573f5788190a635b92121db2cf7 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 1:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:36 p.m.