Triple
T1939469
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Secretary-General of the General People's Congress of Libya |
E41518
|
entity |
| Predicate | realPower |
P33745
|
FINISHED |
| Object | limited |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limited | Statement: [Secretary-General of the General People's Congress of Libya, realPower, limited]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: realPower Context triple: [Secretary-General of the General People's Congress of Libya, realPower, limited]
-
A.
inPower
Indicates that one entity currently holds governing authority, control, or leadership over a group, organization, or domain.
-
B.
inPowerDuring
Indicates that an entity holds a position of authority or governance throughout a specified time period.
-
C.
intendedPower
Indicates the level or amount of power that an entity is designed, planned, or expected to produce, use, or deliver under intended operating conditions.
-
D.
powerBy
Indicates that one entity operates, functions, or is made possible through the energy, resources, or enabling capabilities provided by another entity.
-
E.
powerDirection
Indicates the direction in which power, influence, or control flows from one entity to another.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88649b24c819080047f26b6db2ded |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb2ca385c8190ad0e4bafbb9b5e5c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abaff07cf88190b4883c5f17f90abd |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb25ef0ec8190b907963e9db0fe04 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:06 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.