Triple

T19387071
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roman province of Judea E484961 entity
Predicate currency P245 FINISHED
Object Roman denarius NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Roman denarius | Statement: [Roman province of Judea, currency, Roman denarius]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Roman denarius
Context triple: [Roman province of Judea, currency, Roman denarius]
  • A. denarius chosen
    The denarius was a standard Roman silver coin that became the backbone of the Roman monetary system and a key medium of trade across the Roman world.
  • B. Roman sestertius
    The Roman sestertius was a large bronze coin of the Roman Empire, widely used in everyday transactions and notable for its detailed imperial portraits and propaganda imagery.
  • C. Follis
    The follis was a large bronze coin used in the Byzantine Empire, particularly prominent in the 6th and 7th centuries.
  • D. Aqua Antoniniana
    Aqua Antoniniana was an ancient Roman aqueduct built to supply water to the Baths of Caracalla in Rome.
  • E. Roman mint
    The Roman mint was the official facility in ancient Rome where the state produced its coinage, playing a central role in the empire’s economy and monetary policy.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d460d88190abf0591c5c9d2b0c completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e61b418f148190972b7b46038bc744 completed April 20, 2026, 12:25 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:36 p.m.