Triple

T19376970
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject V2O3 E484696 entity
Predicate bandGapInInsulatingPhase P135713 FINISHED
Object small Mott gap LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: small Mott gap | Statement: [V2O3, bandGapInInsulatingPhase, small Mott gap]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bandGapInInsulatingPhase
Context triple: [V2O3, bandGapInInsulatingPhase, small Mott gap]
  • A. bandGapType
    Indicates the type or nature of the band gap (e.g., direct or indirect) characterizing the electronic transition behavior between energy bands.
  • B. bandgapEngineeredBy
    Indicates that the bandgap of a material or structure has been intentionally modified or tailored through a specific method, process, or design technique.
  • C. hasPhaseTransition
    Indicates that an entity undergoes or exhibits a change from one physical phase or state of matter to another.
  • D. typeOfGap
    Indicates the specific kind or category of gap that exists between or within entities.
  • E. hasRingGap
    Indicates that there is a discontinuity or missing segment in a ring-like structure or arrangement between the related entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d460d88190abf0591c5c9d2b0c completed April 10, 2026, 12:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e61a5cfbf48190ac60e3ffa6baa263 completed April 20, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4fd54f8e48190956e73dd8969164a completed April 19, 2026, 4:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5004c23308190a087b7941a90725f completed April 19, 2026, 4:18 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:35 p.m.