Triple

T19370508
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oka coherence theorem E484522 entity
Predicate typeOfCoherence P135681 FINISHED
Object analytic coherence LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: analytic coherence | Statement: [Oka coherence theorem, typeOfCoherence, analytic coherence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfCoherence
Context triple: [Oka coherence theorem, typeOfCoherence, analytic coherence]
  • A. cooperatingLevel
    Indicates the degree or intensity to which two or more entities are working together toward a shared goal or activity.
  • B. cooperationType
    Indicates the specific kind or form of cooperative relationship that exists between the related entities.
  • C. concurrenceType
    Indicates the specific manner or category in which two or more events, actions, or conditions occur together or overlap in time or effect.
  • D. coerces
    Indicates that one entity forces or pressures another entity to act against their will or better judgment.
  • E. internalCohesion
    Indicates the degree to which elements within a group, system, or structure are mutually connected and unified, resisting fragmentation or internal conflict.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e8d305088190ad13571532aa454c completed April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e619af33e481908643f8beb2f498dc completed April 20, 2026, 12:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4fd54f8e48190956e73dd8969164a completed April 19, 2026, 4:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5004c23308190a087b7941a90725f completed April 19, 2026, 4:18 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:35 p.m.