Triple
T19362296
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Great Betrayal |
E484310
|
entity |
| Predicate | positionOnFreeTrade |
P80797
|
FINISHED |
| Object | critical |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: critical | Statement: [The Great Betrayal, positionOnFreeTrade, critical]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionOnFreeTrade Context triple: [The Great Betrayal, positionOnFreeTrade, critical]
-
A.
positionOnLaissezFaire
chosen
Indicates an entity’s stance or degree of support or opposition toward laissez-faire economic policies.
-
B.
positionOnFreedom
Indicates a stance or viewpoint an entity holds regarding the concept, extent, or conditions of freedom.
-
C.
hasFreeTradeAgreement
Indicates that two entities are linked by a formal free trade agreement that reduces or eliminates trade barriers between them.
-
D.
tradeBloc
Indicates a formal economic relationship in which entities participate together in a trade bloc, coordinating trade policies and often reducing barriers to commerce among members.
-
E.
positionOnNeutrality
Indicates the stance or viewpoint an entity holds regarding neutrality in a given context (e.g., political, ethical, or diplomatic).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e8d305088190ad13571532aa454c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e619a712608190be696a44beda935e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e4fd54f8e48190956e73dd8969164a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 4:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:34 p.m.